Search results

survivorship bias

Never thought I'd see the day.

It was removed due to lag.

Didn't 100% repeat it, I explained how it was what you said as you denied it. Imma stop now though, since you aren't giving any valuable information and I'm leaving for a thing for a few days.

MC probably won't be played in a few years. "Maybe one day that 9 year old will be Head-Admin, you never know, but it would've all started by them being inspired by someone around their age, doing such an important job, at such a high standard." Pretty clearly shows you did say it. "Inspired by...

Read it too fast, and with the confusing wording it tripped me up. Sorry. But still, what does that have anything to do with it? "Maybe one day that 9 year old will be Head-Admin, you never know, but it would've all started by them being inspired by someone around their age, doing such an...

Some are capable, but... you really shouldn't be judging yourself as your own perspective is biased to view yourself in a positive light (that is why you made this topic, so you could hopefully be staff if it passed). There won't be a 9 year old head-admin. No 9 year old is that mature, and nor...

That's comparing the more mature 12 year olds to less mature 14 year olds. Yep. But with more age tends towards more experience which tends towards more maturity.

Seems like an imbalanced map. One side gets into the building first, camps, can get a surprise (or not a surprise but just easier to attack from) position and usually win the 1v1. I'd remove the inside as it can be used to camp, and replace it with a more symmetrical and open indoor space...

I'm saying that a 14 year old will be more mature than a 12 year old (13 years old will depend on the person for how mature they are, either being almost as mature, in between, or being immature)

So allowing more people to do it will make it stay the same amount of applicants? I have a hard time believing that. Yes, but most won't due to not being accepted at all, and it's really easy to get rid of those with age under 14, rather than reading the entire thing. I'm sure there's some...

Even 12/13 year olds are like that. There isn't that much of a difference.

They won't know what a stressful situation is, they'll be like "o yah daz ez ahahaha im 9 lez do its lololololololo" and then, well, yeah. Most people under 14 won't understand it (and quite a few over 14).

I'm not stopping you, I'm just trying to figure out why you'd make another topic when it already exists.

They bought it.

There's no point in doing it, just use the one that already exists. This makes it even more spammy than the original one alone is.

Why make another forum topic for this..?

While there can be mature people under 14... most aren't. There'd be a flood of applications from 9 year olds and others who are not mature enough that would waste time of people reviewing them. It would also look fairly bad on the server to have staff that are that young, as it would be odd to...

Click Me

Zain told me it was a permanent ban for doing it regardless of it being an accident or not. He'll probably deny it though. He likes to do that.

Yeah, that's weird. You drink tea with a fork... and eat soup with a knife.

Since always, used to be 2 weeks then became perm. A bit ridiculous and harsh imo, someone could do it unknowingly, and it's very difficult to get proof if someone really is doing it on purpose, so I think it should go back to the 2 week ban.

I'm not banned.

That's like saying "Wait what you eat you stole my idea of eating." Obviously other people are going to suggest it. Duplicated threads do not get deleted. That was a reply, not a topic. It must be a topic in order to actually be considered... You simply said on another topic that had nothing...